PoddarCo

It’s December – end of year to-do’s, vacations, last minute shopping, scrambling with work requests, enjoying time with families, etc. So instead of a regular post, just a brief thought to share.

Scoping and budgeting are integral to any software release or project.  One month’s left in the calendar year, and 40% of the budget is still there to spend or lose. That doesn’t mean you rush order more hardware than you planned for.  Or you cram many extra features through development even if you don’t have the requirements flushed out or the developers / testers available.  Use left-over funds judiciously and plan project spend/cash-flow for the next year better.

(On the homepage, click speech bubble next to the title to leave comments. On the post page, scroll down.)

Processes should exist as a catalyst for getting work done, not to slow it down. Checks and balances are needed to ensure nothing slips through the cracks, not to cover one team’s tracks so the next in line can be blamed. Documentation is prepared to pave the way for others who follow, not to constrain projects till every excruciating detail is noted.  Dates are necessary for planning, scheduling resources and aligning other work, but need to be kept real.

Some PMs get caught up in demanding these elements from their teams and resources. Releases don’t get scheduled till project codes, install instructions, help guides, dev complete dates, QA completion notices, team-to-team hand off meetings, multi-layered sign-offs and varied support procedures among other things are in place. By then the business (client) needs move on, project demands change, resources shift.

It’s here that a customer focus plays a crucial role.  A customer focus can shed new light on questions like – how can the process minimize redundancy and overhead while maximizing productivity and utilization? Does the process have to be so standardized? Where can you make the process flexible?

My two cents in conclusion: question the rigidity of processes and other must-haves; be alert to these things when they start becoming roadblocks.

(On the homepage, click speech bubble next to the title to leave comments. On the post page, scroll down.)

A bad system will beat a good person more often than not…

Recently, I came across this statement in a book, and started to think more and more about it, wondering about the statement’s validity, application and logic. Thinking out loud, many instances come to mind where this is indeed the case:

1. Corruption anywhere, for example in certain departments in India. Even a good person falls prey to the system.
2. Our building’s condo association and management team – people have the best of intentions when they join, but the established processes and rules hamper their ability to make improvements.
3. A spiraling downwards quality control process or lack of the right procedures in a software development environment – the lack of code checks, test cases, documentation, etc. can quickly affect a motivated newcomer’s good intentions.

Just sharing the thought – a bad system does beat a good person more often than not.

(On the homepage, click speech bubble next to the title to leave comments. On the post page, scroll down)

A buzz word in the PMO’s mission statement (j/k, let’s take a deeper look)

gov⋅ern⋅ance [guhv-er-nuh ns] –noun
1. government; exercise of authority; control.
2. a method or system of government or management

gov⋅ern [guhv-ern] –verb
1. to rule over by right of authority: to govern a nation.
2. to exercise a directing or restraining influence over; guide: the motives governing a decision.
3. to hold in check; control: to govern one’s temper.
4. to serve as or constitute a law for: the principles governing a case.

Almost all the definitions above instantly validate what you and I think project governance is about.  Still, are you confused wondering how it applies to your PMO?  What are some practical, actionable steps to create better governance?  Let’s see what the heck is under the hood.

Project governance comprises of “efforts to work with executives and senior managers to solicit and implement their guidance regarding oversight and control of project performance and project management activities” (Chapter 5: Project Governance. The Complete Project Management Office Handbook, Second Edition).  Mostly everyone realizes this.  However, many PMO’s limit governance to establishing project management guidelines, reviewing some performance metrics and checking progress against the triple constraints.  They miss out on the first half of the description above – efforts to work with executives and senior managers to solicit and implement their guidance.

Without executive involvement, the effectiveness of project governance gets limited, especially when a PMO is striving to establish itself within the organization.  Project governance is the catalyst that the PMO needs to become a viable, effective project management capability.  So, stretch the application of governance beyond setting policies and reviewing performance to using it as a relationship building strategy.  Described below is my interpretation of the project governance framework described in great detail in The Complete Project Management Office Handbook, Second Edition.  This framework efficiently breaks governance into a few practical and actionable steps.

Simple steps to better governance

Most PMOs I have come across had great project charters, policies and authority guidelines.  Some had fairly established project classification guidelines.  Hardly any had an executive control board or a formal committee ensuring business and technical alignment.  How many times have you observed project governance diminishing after the initial funding stage?  Some form of continued executive participation ensures that executives are involved not only in project selection and approval, but also in project execution and delivery.

To that end project governance is more than a buzz word.  It is critical to the PMO’s maturity, adoption and respect within the organization.  Chances are you are already doing many things that fall under governance.  As you try to further streamline your governance efforts, if any particular step leads to heart burn, let me know and I’ll research the cure.  I try to keep blog posts brief, so for more details on this read Chapter-5 from the book referenced below or e-mail your questions to me.  My email address is varunpoddar@poddarco.com.

References:
Hill, Gerard M.  The Complete Project Management Office Handbook, Second Edition. Auerbach Publications. © 2008

(On the homepage, click speech bubble next to the title to leave comments. On the post page, scroll down)